Due to the economic downturn and budget cuts, many participants
indicated that they are reining in costs by giving greater
scrutiny to salary increases, promotions, and restricting
out-of-cycle increases.
Additionally, numerous participants indicated that they are
holding down base salary increase budgets by shifting more
employees to variable, performance driven awards.
Short-Term Incentives (STIs)
Fifty-one percent of respondents indicated that they have a
plan for controlling variable, short-term cash incentive costs
in 2009. The most common strategies companies plan to use to
manage short-term incentives include giving smaller incentives
to poor performers, raising performance targets, reducing the
size of short-term incentives, and reducing the number of
employees eligible for short-term incentives. Only three percent
of companies plan to eliminate short-term cash incentives in
2009
(Figure 2).
Fifteen percent of companies were undecided on how they will
control short-term incentive costs in 2009.

Note: Participants could select more than one option.
Short-term incentives (STIs)
include bonuses, commissions, cash profit sharing, and other
variable cash payments earned within a one-year period.
Sales Compensation
The most common strategy companies plan to use to control
sales compensation in 2009 is setting larger quotas and sales
targets (Figure 3).
Additional methods reported by participants to manage sales
compensation costs include windfall policies on commissions
earned through little effort, restricting certain accounts from
commissions, lowering commissions, implementing flat maximums on
earnings from a single contract or sale, changing the pay mix to
have a lower base with a higher variable component, increasing
sales thresholds before commissions are paid, increasing sales
hurdles before higher commission rates are paid, and lowering
commission multipliers.
Sixteen percent of companies were undecided on how they will
control sales compensation costs in 2009.

Note: Participants could select more than one option.
Long-Term Incentives (LTIs)
The most common strategies companies plan to use to control
long-term incentives include reducing the number of employees
eligible for long-term incentives and giving smaller awards to
poor performers and non-key employees. Other strategies
companies plan to use to control long-term incentives include
raising performance targets and reducing the size of long-term
incentive awards. Only two percent of companies plan to
eliminate long-term incentives in 2009 (Figure 4) (Table 4).
Sixteen percent of companies were undecided on how they will
control long-term incentive costs in 2009.

Note: Participants could select more than one option.
Hiring Strategies
The most common hiring strategies companies plan to use to
control compensation costs in 2009 include limiting hiring to
only fill critical jobs, reducing headcount through attrition,
and reducing headcount through layoffs (Figure 5) (Table 5).
Additional hiring strategies reported by participants to control
compensation costs include reducing headcount through
outsourcing, hiring more part-time employees, and increasing
offshoring to use labor in lower cost locations and countries.
It’s worth noting that most of the companies reporting a hiring
freeze indicated that they plan to backfill critical jobs.

Note: Participants could select more than one option.
Control Compensation Costs Wisely
In this time of economic uncertainty, it is critical to attract top
talent and retain star performers who will drive your organization’s
success in difficult market conditions. You cannot afford to guess about
compensation rates of key employees or make "across the board" salary
increases or freezes. A modest investment in current market data will
help you allocate your compensation dollars wisely and in the right
places.
Culpepper Compensation Surveys
provide the data you need to establish competitive and effective
compensation plans. Comprehensive data is provided on
base salaries,
salary structures, incentives, allowances, total cash
compensation, equity-based compensation, pay and benefits
practices, as well as job descriptions.
Additional Breakouts / Data Tables
In addition to the
figures above, we provide a more comprehensive
report with data tables showing breakouts by number of
employees, industry sector, and corporate status.
Data Source:
Culpepper Pay Practices & Policies Survey
of 302 participating organizations.
Survey Dates: October 2008
Breakdown by Industry Sector:
Technology 66%, Life
Science 17%, Healthcare 7%, Other 10%
Breakdown by Number of Employees:
Up to 100: 19%, 101 to
1000: 37%, Over 1,000: 44%
Breakdown
by Corporate Status:
Public 43%, Private 50%, Non-Profit 10%,
Government 1%
Breakdown
by Country:
United States 91%, Canada 6%, Other 3%
Copying.
If you copy portions of
this report into your own publication, please cite your source
by including the following:
"Source:
Culpepper Pay Practices & Policies Surveys, November 2008,
www.culpepper.com"