In both weak and strong job markets, turnover can hinder a
company from growing and competing effectively.
Turnover occurs when an employee leaves a job involuntarily or
voluntarily. Involuntary turnover occurs when employees are
terminated by cause or layoff. Voluntary turnover occurs when
employees resign or retire. Voluntary turnover, in particular,
must be closely watched and managed.
Why is turnover important to measure? It is
really a two-edged sword.
-
Turnover is
Too High
If turnover is too high, it is extremely
difficult for a company to maintain any semblance of
efficiency and effectiveness. For example, a company with a
compensation plan that pays below market or has a
poor benefit plan will risk losing key employees. As soon as
employees become fully productive in their jobs, they leave
for other opportunities. Employee morale suffers, recruiting
and training costs skyrocket, and supervisors spend more
time recruiting and training than on more productive
activities. If the organization is attempting to grow,
losses due to termination offset growth and magnify these
costs.
Competitive job markets, such as technology and life
sciences, have higher voluntary turnover rates than most
other sectors. It is critical for companies that depend on
technical and scientific talent to measure turnover and
understand why top talent leaves.
- Turnover is Too Low
On the other hand, if turnover is too low, it may
indicate that a company is doing some things too well. A
company with a compensation plan that pays above market
or a rich benefit plan will typically retain more employees
and have lower turnover. However, “above market”
compensation and benefits plans also increase expenses,
which in turn make it more difficult to hire new employees
and maintain necessary staffing levels.
Another problem that corresponds with too-low turnover is
what is sometimes called organizational arterial
sclerosis. To some degree, every organization needs new
blood so that new ideas, approaches, and perspectives are
continually added. Organizations with too-low turnover often
have groups of employees who are retired-in-place. Their
productivity -- and that of the overall organization -- is
far below what it should be; yet, they remain in place.
To hedge against turnover becoming too high or
too low, companies should regularly evaluate practices and
policies that retain, motive, and engage employees, including
compensation & benefit plans, incentives, career development
opportunities, and work-life balance.
Turnover Trends
From 2007 to 2009, average voluntary turnover dropped from 14
percent to 7 percent, while involuntary turnover increased from
4 percent to 10 percent. During the same period, layoffs climbed
from 4 percent to 7 percent
(Figure 1).
In 2009, voluntary turnover was higher for technology (7%)
and life science (8%) companies than companies in other sectors
(5%).

These trends are a stark demonstration of the impact the recent
global recession had on the job market. While many workers were
getting laid off, others stayed at jobs that they might have left in
rosier economic times.
In competitive and healthy job markets,
voluntary turnover is significantly higher than involuntary turnover. Based on historical trends and
headcount growth projections, we
expect voluntary turnover to exceed involuntary turnover in
2010.
Turnover Rates by Industry Sector
In addition
to the figure above, we provide a more
comprehensive report with a data table showing how turnover
rates vary by industry sector, number of employees, and
ownership.
Industry sector breakouts include: Software, IT Services,
Hardware/Electronics/Semiconductor, Internet/Network/Telecom
Services, Medical Devices & Equipment, Biotechnology &
Pharmaceutical, Lab Services/Research, and "Other
Non-Tech/Non-Life Science".
The comprehensive
report also includes data tables covering:
-
Hiring Plans for 2010
(by Number of Employees,
Industry Sector, Ownership)
-
Headcount Growth Rates by
Job Level
(Executives, Director & Manager,
Professional, Non-Exempt/Non-Professional)
-
Headcount Growth Rates by
Department / Job Function
(Accounting & Finance, Customer
Service & Support, Human Resources, IT, Lab Services,
Legal/Regulatory/Government Affairs, Manufacturing &
Production, Marketing, R&D, Sales)
-
Headcount Distribution by
Job Level
-
Headcount Distribution by
Department / Job Function
-
Headcount Distribution:
Full-Time to Part-Time Employee Mix
-
Headcount Distribution:
Employee to Contract Worker Mix
Availability of Comprehensive Report as Downloadable PDF

-
Free to participants in
2010 Hiring Plans & Staffing Ratios Survey
-
Free to Culpepper Library
and Small
Company Plus subscribers.
-
$295 for non-participants and non-subscribers
(Order
Form)
Data Source: Culpepper Trends Survey of 191
participating organizations.
Survey Dates: January 8 through March
26, 2010
Breakdown by Sector:
Technology 58%, Life Sciences 18%, Other
24%
Participant
Breakdown by Number of Employees:
Up to 100: 31%, 101 to
500: 30%, 501 to 2,500: 21%, 2,500 to 10,000: 12%, Over 10,000:
6%
Participant Breakdown
by Ownership/Corporate Status:
Public 31%, Private 59%, Non-Profit
9%,
Other 1%
Participant Breakdown
by Country:
United States 91%, Canada 4%,
Other 5%
Copying.
If you decide to copy portions of
this article into your own publication or transmission, please
cite your source by including the following: "Source: Culpepper
Trends Surveys, June 2010,
www.culpepper.com"