Salary
Range Structure Practices
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1:
Percent of Companies with Formal Salary Range Structures |
|
| All Companies |
71% |
| Number Employees | |
|
1 to 100 |
42% |
|
101 to 500 |
61% |
|
501 to 2,500 |
82% |
|
2,501 to 10,000 |
81% |
|
Over 10,000 |
80% |
Frequency of Salary
Range Structure Review
Salary range structures should be reviewed regularly to maintain
a competitive edge in attracting and retaining top talent. Most
companies with formal base salary range structures review their
ranges and structures annually (Table 2). Seventeen percent of
companies review salary structures every two or three years.
| Table 2: Frequency of Salary Range Structure Review | |||||
| Job Level | Percent of Companies | ||||
| Annually | Every Two Years | Every Three Years | Other / Varies |
No Formal Ranges for Job Level |
|
|
Executives |
68% |
10% |
6% |
2% |
14% |
|
Non-Executives |
80% |
11% |
6% |
2% |
1% |
| Non-Executives include: Directors & Managers, Professionals, and Hourly & Non-Exempt | |||||
Fourteen percent of participants with formal
salary range structures reported that they do not use salary
structures with executives.
Fewer than two percent of companies reported Other/Varies.
Companies choosing “other” indicated that the frequency for
reviewing structures varies by type of job, business unit,
location, or union status. Examples include:
Some companies with union employees review salary structures based on the length of multi-year labor contracts and review other non-union jobs annually.
Some companies in very competitive job
markets review salary structures for critical jobs
semi-annually.
Methods Used to
Design Salary Range Structures
The two most common methods companies use to design base salary
structure ranges are
market pricing
using external market data and point-factor
focusing on internal pay equity.
Most companies use a market-pricing approach with current salary survey data for individual jobs, to design and adjust salary range structures (Figure 1). Only four percent of companies rely solely on the point-factor method, which assigns a point value to specific jobs within a company.
Twenty-four percent of companies blend market-based and point-factor approaches when designing their salary range structures.

Traditional vs. Broadband Salary Structures
Traditional salary structures are organized with numerous layers
and range structures (or pay grades) with a relatively small
distance between each range. Traditional structures provide a
hierarchal system enabling employees to be promoted from one pay
grade to another. When designed correctly, traditional
structures enable the recognition of differing rates of pay for
performance and guarantee a reasonable level of control over
internal compression and salary expenditures.
Broadband salary structures are more flexible and consolidate pay grades into fewer structures with wider salary ranges. Broadband structures tend to be used by relatively flat organizations with fewer levels and smaller companies without a dedicated compensation staff to establish traditional structures.
On average, 78 percent of companies use traditional salary structures, while only 11 percent use broadband structures (Figure 2). Nine percent utilize a hybrid or mix of traditional and broadband structures.

Two percent of companies reported Other/Varies. Companies choosing “other” indicated that the types of structures used varies by type of job, business unit, location, or union status.
Single vs. Multiple Salary Structures
Fifty-five percent of companies with salary range structures
have
multiple structures varying by job and/or geographic location
(Table 3).
As companies increase in size, they typically have a higher number of salary structures to accommodate more locations and job structures. Companies with more than 500 employees are more likely to have multiple locations and use different salary structures varying by geographic location than companies with fewer than 500 employees.
There is a strong correlation between job level and number of salary structures. Single salary structures are more common for executives and multiple salary structures are more common for lower-level positions. For example, 58 percent of companies have single structures for executives and 63 percent of companies have multiple salary structures for hourly and non-exempt employees.
| Table 3: Single vs. Multiple Salary Structures | |||||
| Percent of Companies | |||||
|
Single Structure |
Multiple Structures Differing by Job Function | Multiple Structures Differing by Geographic Location | Multiple Structures Differing by Job and Geography | Other | |
| All Companies |
43% |
21% |
19% |
15% |
3% |
| Number Employees | |||||
|
1 to 100 |
42% | 41% | 8% | 6% | 4% |
|
101 to 500 |
47% | 29% | 8% | 16% | 2% |
|
501 to 2,500 |
46% | 18% | 21% | 13% | 2% |
|
2,501 to 10,000 |
41% | 12% | 23% | 21% | 3% |
|
Over 10,000 |
39% | 14% | 27% | 15% | 4% |
| Job Level | |||||
|
Executives |
58% | 18% | 12% | 8% | 4% |
|
Directors / Managers |
43% | 21% | 19% | 15% | 2% |
|
Professional |
38% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 2% |
|
Hourly / Non-Exempt |
34% | 21% | 24% | 18% | 3% |
| Note: Significant differences were not found between industry sectors and different types of ownership. | |||||
Additional Data Tables
In addition to the data tables and figures above, we provide a more comprehensive
report
with additional breakouts and data tables including:
Salary Range Spreads by Job Level
Salary Range Midpoint-to-Midpoint Differentials by Job Level
Salary Range Overlaps by Job Level
Availability of Comprehensive Salary Range Structure
Practices Report
as Downloadable PDF
![]()
Free to participants in 2009 Culpepper Salary Range Structure Practices Survey
Free to subscribers of
Culpepper Pay
Practices & Policies Survey Package
(includes Culpepper Library and Small
Company Plus subscribers)
$295 for non-participants and non-subscribers (Order Form)
Salary Range
Structures by Job and Job Family
In addition to the
salary range structure practices data provided in the salary
range structures practices report presented above,
Culpepper Compensation Surveys provide base salary range
metrics for individual jobs and job families.
Minimum of Base Salary Structure Range
Midpoint / Control Point of Base Salary Structure Range
Maximum of Base
Salary Structure Range
Data Source: 2009 Culpepper
Salary Range Structure Practices Survey of
332 organizations.
Survey Dates: August 20 through October 8, 2009
Participants by Sector:
Technology 47%, Life Sciences 12%, Healthcare Services 7%,
Energy 3%, Engineering 1%, Other 30%
Participants by Number of Employees:
Up to 100:
18%, 101 to
500: 19%, 501 to 2,500: 29%, 2,501 to 10,000:
22%, Over 10,000: 12%
Participants by Ownership:
Public 42%, Private 44%, Non-Profit
10%,
Government 3%, Other 1%
Participants by Location:
United States 90%, Canada 5%,
Other 5%
Copying.
If you copy portions of
this report into your own publication, please cite your source
by including the following:
"Source:
2009 Culpepper
Salary Range Structure Practices Survey ,
November 2009,
www.culpepper.com"
Other Related Reports and Surveys:
Salary Range Structure Increases for 2009 and 2010 (September 2009)
Salary Increase Budgets for 2009 and 2010 (September 2009)
|
Home |
Compensation Surveys |
Pay Practices Surveys |
Benefits Surveys |
Job Descriptions |
eBulletin
|