Culpepper Compensation & Benefits Surveys


Salary Range Structure Practices
November 6, 2009

Salary structures are an important component of effective compensation programs and help ensure that pay levels for groups of jobs are both externally competitive and internally equitable. An effective salary structure allows management to reward performance and the development of skills, while controlling overall base salary cost by providing a cap on the range paid for particular jobs or locations.

The following article provides a summary of results from a 2009 Culpepper Pay Practices Survey on base salary range structure practices. This year's report includes market data and practices for designing and managing salary ranges and structures including:

  • Percent of Companies with Formal Salary Range Structures

  • Frequency Salary Range Structures are Reviewed

  • Methods Used to Design Salary Range Structures

  • Traditional vs. Broadband Salary Structures

  • Single vs. Multiple Salary Structures

  • Salary Range Spreads

  • Salary Range Midpoint-to-Midpoint Differentials

  • Salary Range Overlaps

Key Survey Findings

  • 71 percent of surveyed companies reported having formal base salary range structures.

  • 77 percent of companies with formal base salary range structures, review their structures annually.

  • 94 percent use market data when designing salary structures.

  • 78 percent use traditional salary structures and 11 percent use broadband structures.

  • 55 percent have multiple structures varying by job and/or geographic location.

  • Salary range spreads and midpoint-to-midpoint differentials vary significantly by job level.

Salary Ranges and Structures Defined
A salary range is the span between the minimum and maximum base salary an organization will pay for a specific job or group of jobs.

A salary range structure (or salary structure) is a hierarchal group of jobs and salary ranges within an organization. Salary structures are often expressed as pay grades or job grades that reflect the value of a job in the external market and/or the internal value to an organization.

Percent of Companies with Formal Base Salary Range Structures
Seventy-one percent of surveyed companies reported having formal base salary range structures (Table 1). However, as companies increase in size they are more likely to have salary range structures. Less than half of companies with fewer than 100 employees use salary range structures. In contrast, about four out of five companies with more than 500 employees use salary range structures.

Table 1: Percent of Companies with
Formal Salary Range Structures
All Companies

71%

Number Employees  

1 to 100

42%

101 to 500

61%

501 to 2,500

82%

2,501 to 10,000

81%

Over 10,000

80%

Frequency of Salary Range Structure Review
Salary range structures should be reviewed regularly to maintain a competitive edge in attracting and retaining top talent. Most companies with formal base salary range structures review their ranges and structures annually (Table 2). Seventeen percent of companies review salary structures every two or three years.

Table 2: Frequency of Salary Range Structure Review
Job Level Percent of Companies
Annually Every Two Years Every Three Years Other / Varies No Formal Ranges for
Job Level

Executives

68%

10%

6%

2%

14%

Non-Executives

80%

11%

6%

2%

1%
Non-Executives include: Directors & Managers, Professionals, and Hourly & Non-Exempt

Fourteen percent of participants with formal salary range structures reported that they do not use salary structures with executives.

Fewer than two percent of companies reported Other/Varies. Companies choosing “other” indicated that the frequency for reviewing structures varies by type of job, business unit, location, or union status. Examples include:

  • Some companies with union employees review salary structures based on the length of multi-year labor contracts and review other non-union jobs annually.

  • Some companies in very competitive job markets review salary structures for critical jobs
    semi-annually.

Methods Used to Design Salary Range Structures
The two most common methods companies use to design base salary structure ranges are market pricing using external market data and point-factor focusing on internal pay equity.

Most companies use a market-pricing approach with current salary survey data for individual jobs, to design and adjust salary range structures (Figure 1). Only four percent of companies rely solely on the point-factor method, which assigns a point value to specific jobs within a company.

Twenty-four percent of companies blend market-based and point-factor approaches when designing their salary range structures.

Traditional vs. Broadband Salary Structures
Traditional salary structures are organized with numerous layers and range structures (or pay grades) with a relatively small distance between each range. Traditional structures provide a hierarchal system enabling employees to be promoted from one pay grade to another. When designed correctly, traditional structures enable the recognition of differing rates of pay for performance and guarantee a reasonable level of control over internal compression and salary expenditures.

Broadband salary structures are more flexible and consolidate pay grades into fewer structures with wider salary ranges. Broadband structures tend to be used by relatively flat organizations with fewer levels and smaller companies without a dedicated compensation staff to establish traditional structures.

On average, 78 percent of companies use traditional salary structures, while only 11 percent use broadband structures (Figure 2). Nine percent utilize a hybrid or mix of traditional and broadband structures.

Two percent of companies reported Other/Varies. Companies choosing “other” indicated that the types of structures used varies by type of job, business unit, location, or union status.

Single vs. Multiple Salary Structures
Fifty-five percent of companies with salary range structures have multiple structures varying by job and/or geographic location (Table 3).

As companies increase in size, they typically have a higher number of salary structures to accommodate more locations and job structures. Companies with more than 500 employees are more likely to have multiple locations and use different salary structures varying by geographic location than companies with fewer than 500 employees.

There is a strong correlation between job level and number of salary structures. Single salary structures are more common for executives and multiple salary structures are more common for lower-level positions. For example, 58 percent of companies have single structures for executives and 63 percent of companies have multiple salary structures for hourly and non-exempt employees.

Table 3: Single vs. Multiple Salary Structures
  Percent of Companies
Single
Structure
Multiple Structures Differing by Job Function Multiple Structures Differing by Geographic Location Multiple Structures Differing by Job and Geography Other
All Companies

43%

21%

19%

15%

3%
Number Employees          

1 to 100

42% 41% 8% 6% 4%

101 to 500

47% 29% 8% 16% 2%

501 to 2,500

46% 18% 21% 13% 2%

2,501 to 10,000

41% 12% 23% 21% 3%

Over 10,000

39% 14% 27% 15% 4%
Job Level          

Executives

58% 18% 12% 8% 4%

Directors / Managers

43% 21% 19% 15% 2%

Professional

38% 22% 20% 18% 2%

Hourly / Non-Exempt

34% 21% 24% 18% 3%
Note: Significant differences were not found between industry sectors and different types of ownership.

Additional Data Tables
In addition to the data tables and figures above, we provide a more comprehensive report
with additional breakouts and data tables including:

  • Salary Range Spreads by Job Level

  • Salary Range Midpoint-to-Midpoint Differentials by Job Level

  • Salary Range Overlaps by Job Level

Availability of Comprehensive Salary Range Structure Practices Report
as Downloadable PDF

Salary Range Structures by Job and Job Family
In addition to the salary range structure practices data provided in the salary range structures practices report presented above, Culpepper Compensation Surveys provide base salary range metrics for individual jobs and job families.

  • Minimum of Base Salary Structure Range

  • Midpoint / Control Point of Base Salary Structure Range

  • Maximum of Base Salary Structure Range
     


Data Source: 2009 Culpepper Salary Range Structure Practices Survey of 332 organizations.
Survey Dates: August 20 through October 8, 2009

Participants by Sector:
Technology 47%, Life Sciences 12%, Healthcare Services 7%, Energy 3%, Engineering 1%, Other 30%

Participants by Number of Employees:
Up to 100: 18%, 101 to  500: 19%, 501 to 2,500: 29%, 2,501 to 10,000: 22%, Over 10,000: 12%

Participants by Ownership:
Public 42%, Private 44%, Non-Profit 10%, Government 3%, Other 1%

Participants by Location:
United States 90%, Canada 5%, Other 5%

Copying. If you copy portions of this report into your own publication, please cite your source by including the following:
"Source:
2009 Culpepper Salary Range Structure Practices Survey , November 2009, www.culpepper.com"


Other Related Reports and Surveys:

Bookmark and Share


Stay informed of current trends and practices for compensation & benefits programs.
Subscribe to our FREE monthly e-mail newsletter

Home | Compensation Surveys | Pay Practices Surveys | Benefits Surveys | Job Descriptions | eBulletin
Order Forms | Site Map | About Us | Contact Us

© 2009 Culpepper and Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved.